DAMPAK KOMPENSASI TERHADAP LOYALITAS KARYAWAN PADA PT. SURYA PILAR PERKASA DI PEKANBARU

Authors

  • Muhammad Ali Aqsa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36975/jeb.v11i4.295

Keywords:

Compensation, Loyalty

Abstract

This research was conducted at PT. Surya Pilar Perkasa. One way used to increase employee loyalty for companies is compensation. Compensation is a form of reward received by employees in lieu of services they have provided to the company. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of compensation on employee loyalty PT. Surya Pillars of Might. The population in this study were 85 employees. The sample taken is the whole of the population of 85 employees. For the regression of linear analysis, the regression equation is generated as follows: Y = 6.464 + 1.421.X and the constant value of 6.464 states that if the value of X = 0 or Compensation variable does not exist, then the value of Employee Loyalty variable is 6.464. The regression coefficient of the Compensation variable is 1.421, meaning that every addition of 1 (one) variable point of Compensation, then it will increase employee loyalty equal to 1.421 times. The interpretation of the equation above is that the variable regression coefficient of Compensation (X) has a positive sign (1.421), which implies that Compensation is in line with Employee Loyalty variable, in other words that the Compensation variable has a positive impact on Employee Loyalty. Based on the value of t, obtained t-count of 2.952 at the sig level of 0.000. The calculation results show that Compensation has t arithmetic larger than t table that is 2.952> 1,988 which means Ho is rejected so Ha accepted. It can be concluded that the Compensation variable has a significant influence on employee loyalty in PT. Surya Pilar Perkasa Pekanbaru. Furthermore, R2 value of 0.669. Because this coefficient determination test obtained from simple linear regression calculation, the coefficient of determination of 0.669 or R2 x 100% by 67%. The meaning of the value has the implication that the compensation variable affects Loyalty by 67%, and the rest is influenced by other variables.

Author Biography

  • Muhammad Ali Aqsa, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Riau
    Manajemen

References

Al Fajar, Siti dan Tri Heru. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Sebagai Dasar Meraih Keunggulan Bersaing. UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2008. Manajemen Personalia Dan Sumberdaya Manusia. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Hasibuan, P.S. Malayu. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

¬¬¬________2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

________2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

________2006.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Heryati, Agustina. 2016. Jurnal Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan Di Departemen Operasi PT. Pupuk Sriwidjaja Palembang. Volume 1 Nomor 2 Edisi Agustus, Fasilkom UIGM, Palembang.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan kesepuluh, Rosda, Bandung.

________2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Cetakan kesepuluh, Rosda, Bandung.

Marpaung, Rio dan Maria Krisna. 2012. Jurnal Pengaruh kecerdasan Emosional Pemimpin Terhadap Kinerja dan Loyalitas Karyawan di PT Riau Andalan Pulp And Paper Bisnis Unit Riau Fiber. Volume 10 Nomor 3 September, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru.

Martono, Nanang. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Muhadjir, Noeng. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Rake Sarasin, Jogyakarta.

Musyafi’, Roihatul, Hamidah Nayati Utami, dan Yuniadi Mayowan. 2016. Pengaruh Kompensasi Finansial Dan Non Finansial Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan PT PLN (Persero) Area Pelayanan dan Jaringan (APJ) Malang. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, Volume 39, Nomor 2, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Notoadmodjo, Soekidjo. 2009. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan keempat, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Oprianti, Rita. 2016. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan Pada PT. Jatim Jaya Perkasa di Indragiri Hulu. Pekanbaru: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Riau.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan Dari Teori Praktik. Murai Kencana, Depok.

Safitri, Rahmadana. 2015. Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan Pada PT. Putera Lautan Kumala Lines Samarinda. eJournal Administrasi Bisnis, Volume 3, Nomor 3, Fisip Universitas Mulawarman.

Sasrtohardiwiryo, Siswanto. 2002. Manajamen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administratif dan Operasional. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Saydam, Gouzali. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi kedua, Toko Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Setyosari, Punaji. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pengembangan. Cetakan kelima, Kencana, Jakarta.

Sofyandi, Herman. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono, 2004. Statistik Untuk Penelitian.. Alfabeta, Bandung.

________ 2005. Statistik Untuk Penelitian.. Alfabeta, Bandung.

________ 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Supranto, 2009. Statistik Teori dan Aplikasi. Edisi ketujuh, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Sutrisno, Edy.2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan kesembilan, Kencana, , Jakarta.

Suwatno, dan Doni Juni Priansa. 2011. Manajemen SDM Dalam Organisasi Publik Dan Bisnis. Cetakan kedua, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Umar, Husein. 2011. Metode Penelitian Untuk Skripsi Dan Tesis Bisnis. Edisi Kedua, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Usman, Husaini. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Social. Edisi Kedua. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Winardi, 2008. Manajemen Perubahan. Prenada Media Group, Jakarta

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles